My point of view on adding fluoride to Portland water began during the mayoral campaign when I asked candidate Charlie Hales about it and was satisfied with his answer. His was the same as Jeff Smith’s: adding fluoride to water is a no-brainer based on the science and numbers, but putting it to a public vote – Jeff was particularly adamant about this - is the right thing to do.
Later a friend and colleague asked me to get involved with
the Clean Water Portland people, and I said I’d be happy to talk but that I
didn’t agree with them.
I had a bristly phone call with Rick North, a volunteer on
the leadership team of Clean Water Portland and a 30-year veteran of grass-roots
political campaigns.
“Personally, my wish is for the best outcome for my community,”
I wrote to him afterwards. “Neither side has convinced me, but so far
‘Flouride-Good; is in the lead. I certainly don't want another nasty political
war - I'd like a meaningful dialogue leading to the best decision. My wish
would be for you to make that happen, but it would take some cooperation and
shared intent from your "opponent" as well.”
Rick told me not to hold my breath.
That was January. I’ve spent the last few months learning
as much as I can about the issue from both sides, having conversations with
friends, both on- and off-line, and finally hosting a conversation in my studio
with two of the leaders from both sides, including Rick. That was a couple of
nights ago. We just posted it.
“Well? What’s the answer?” my friends have asked,
including some of the attendees of the conversation, who were as cloudy before
our couple of hours together as they were before.
Here’s where I’ve come out:
Fluoride is good for teeth. It remineralizes teeth and
prevents decay. The CDC called dental fluoridation one of the great health
achievements of the 20th century.
Dental health is a foundation of overall health. Dental
problems can lead to greater and greater health problems, even death. Everyone deserves good dental health.
Fluoride is one piece of dental health. Others are access
to dental care, healthy food, an effective dental hygiene program and
preventive measures such as dental sealants.
For lower income people in our community, particularly
children, some people believe that fluoridated water might be the most
effective way to provide some access to fluoride.
If we were to add fluoride to the water, since very little
is actually consumed, most of it would be wasted and deposited elsewhere, as
much as 99% of it.
Some people are sensitive to fluoride and would be forced
to drink it or buy bottled water. There are legitimate concerns about the
safety of the fluorosilicic acid itself.
Globally the rates of cavities and dental decay are going
down, and those trends are the same in countries that fluoridate their water
and ones that don’t.
Most of Europe has chosen not to fluoridate its water, due
to safety, ethical, and effectiveness concerns.
Portland has been resisting fluoride for years and years. We
are the last big holdout in the US. We’re either idiots - crackpots who won’t
listen to science - or people who believe that our ethos demands that we ask
deeper questions and create our own solutions and processes to accomplish our
shared goals.
Portland drives me crazy in a lot of ways, but I love that
about it. Oregon too. We do things our own way, always thinking there’s a
better way to do something: the Bottle Bill, Beach Bill, tearing down highways,
light rail, etc. I believe we're resisting fluoride because we know there has
to be a better way of creating shared dental health than turning our wonderful
water into a drug delivery system.
I want to get fluoride to kids who need it. I want all of
Portland to have good dental health. How do we do it safely, effectively,
efficiently, in a way that is fair to all the people of Portland and that
honors the treasured resource of our wonderful water?
That is the work we have to come together and do ahead.
First, I am going to vote no on Measure 26-151.

















